# My First Half Means Container. Not A Lot Of People Understand My Language. What Am I? Riddle: Here Is The Logical Explanation For The Riddle Answer

Updated: Oct 15,2020 11:27 GMT

Shalini

My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle: Here is a mind-blowing riddle which is now trending on Social Media’s including whatsapp, facebook, instagram, etc. Read throughout the article My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle and find the right answer for the same. Solve the riddle given here and challenge your friends and family. My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle is very interesting. Check it out here!

## Why Should One Solve Riddle?

In this pandemic situation, due to Covid-19, most of them are spending their time on mobiles phones and laptops by playing games, reading, cooking, texting to their loved ones through social media like whatsapp, instagram, facebook, etc. Apart from sharing updates related to Covid-19, most of them are challenging their friends and family to solve these types of puzzles and riddles. Here is the riddle for you to solve ‘My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle.’ Share and challenge your friends and family. Have a look!

## Here is the My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle for you!

Read the My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle given below and to solve the puzzle. It’s really fun!

My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I?

Can you guess the riddle?

## What is the answer to the My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle?

Check whether the answer you guess is what given below:

The answer for My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle is “Binary.”

## Explanation:

In this riddle, the one who is trying to solve must read between the lines carefully. It is just given in simple words and can find the answer for this riddle easily. Binary information is sometimes also referred to as machine language since it represents the most fundamental level of information stored in a computer system. Half of Binary is 'BIN', which means container.

### My first half means container. Not a lot of people understand my language. What am I? Riddle - FAQ's

1. A murderer is condemned to death. He has to choose between three rooms. The first is full of raging fires, the second is full of assassins with loaded guns, and the third is full of lions that haven't eaten in 3 years. Which room is safest for him?

The third room, because those lions haven't eaten in three years, so they are dead.

2. A prisoner is told: "If you tell a lie, we will hang you and if you tell the truth, we will shoot you". What did the prisoner say to save himself?

"You will hang me"

3. Afterwards he meets another two aborigines. One says: "I am a Swindlecant or the other one is an Honestant." Who are they?

Logical disjunction is a statement "P or Q". Such a disjunction is false if both P and Q are false. In all other cases it is true. Note that in everyday language, use of the word "or" can sometimes mean "either, but not both" (e.g., "would you like tea or coffee?"). In logic, this is called an "exclusive disjunction" or "exclusive or" (xor).
So if A was a swindlecant, then his statement would be false (thus A would have to be an honestant and B would have to be a swindlecant). However, that would cause a conflict which implicates that A must be an honestant. In that case at least one part of his statement is true and as it can't be the first one, B must be an honestant, too.

4. Our gringo was lucky and survived. On his way to the pub he met three aborigines. One made this statement: "We are all Swindlecants." The second one concluded: "Just one of us is an honest man." Who are they?

The first one must be a swindlecant (otherwise he would bring himself into a liar paradox), and so (knowing that the first one is lying) there must be at least one honestant among them. If the second one is lying, then (as the first one stated) the third one is an honestant, but that would make the second one speak the truth. So the second one is an honestant and C is a swindlecant.

5. In the pub the gringo met a funny guy who said: "If my wife is an Honestant, then I am Swindlecant." Who is this couple?

It is important to explore the statement as a whole. In this logical conditional ("if-then" statement) p is a hypothesis (or antecedent) and q is a conclusion (or consequent).
It is obvious, that the husband is not a Swindlecant, because in that case one part of the statement (Q) " ... then I am Swindlecant." would have to be a lie, which is a conflict. And since A is an Honestant, the whole statement is true.
If his wife was an Honestant too, then the second part of statement (Q) " ... then I am Swindlecant." would have to be true, which is a conflict again. Therefore the man is an Honestant and his wife is a Swindlecant. Or is it a paradox? Think about it.