I Can Be Flipped And Broken But I Never Move. Riddle: Here Is Riddle with an Answer Logical Explanation

Updated: Oct 14,2020 08:28 GMT

social social social social I Can Be Flipped And Broken But I Never Move. Riddle: Here Is Riddle with an Answer Logical Explanation

Suganya

I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle: Here is a mind-blowing riddle, I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle, which is now trending on Social Media’s including whatsapp, facebook, instagram, etc. Read throughout the article I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle and find the right answer for the same. Solve the riddle given here, I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle and challenge your friends and family. I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle is very interesting. Check it out here!

 

Why Should One Solve Riddle?

In this pandemic situation, due to Covid-19, most of them are spending their time on mobiles phones and laptops by playing games, reading, cooking, texting to their loved ones through social media like whatsapp, instagram, facebook, etc. Apart from sharing updates related to Covid-19, most of them are challenging their friends and family to solve these types of puzzles and riddles. Here is the riddle for you to solve ‘I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle.’ Share and challenge your friends and family. Have a look!

Here is the I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle for you! 

Read the I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle given below and to solve the puzzle. It’s really fun! 

I can be flipped and broken but I never move. I can be closed, and opened, and sometimes removed. I am sealed by hands. What am I?

Can you guess the riddle?

What is the answer to the I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle?

Check whether the answer you guess is what given below:

The answer for I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle is “Deal.”

Explanation:

In this riddle, the one who is trying to solve must read between the lines carefully. It is just given in simple words and can find the answer for this riddle easily. If you make a deal, do a deal, or cut a deal, you complete an agreement or an arrangement with someone. So, deal can be flipped and broken but it cannot move and is sealed by hands.

 

I can be flipped and broken but I never move. Riddle - FAQs

1. There are two kinds of people on a mysterious island. There are so-called Honestants who speak always the truth, and the others are Swindlecants who always lie. Three fellows (A, B and C) are having a quarrel at the market. A gringo goes by and asks the A fellow: "Are you an Honestant or a Swindlecant?" The answer is incomprehensible so the gringo gives another quite logical question to B: "What did A say?" B answers: "A said that he is a Swindlecant." And to that says the fellow C: "Do not believe B, he is lying!" Who is B and C?

It is impossible that any inhabitant of such an island says: "I am a liar." An honestant would thus be lying and a swindlecant would be speaking truth. So B must have been lying and therefore he is a swindlecant. And that means that C was right saying B is lying - so C is an honestant. However, it is not clear what is A.

2. Afterwards he meets another two aborigines. One says: "I am a Swindlecant or the other one is an Honestant." Who are they?

Logical disjunction is a statement "P or Q". Such a disjunction is false if both P and Q are false. In all other cases it is true. Note that in everyday language, use of the word "or" can sometimes mean "either, but not both" (e.g., "would you like tea or coffee?"). In logic, this is called an "exclusive disjunction" or "exclusive or" (xor).
So if A was a swindlecant, then his statement would be false (thus A would have to be an honestant and B would have to be a swindlecant). However, that would cause a conflict which implicates that A must be an honestant. In that case at least one part of his statement is true and as it can't be the first one, B must be an honestant, too.

3. Our gringo displeased the sovereign with his intrusive questions and was condemned to death. But there was also a chance to save himself by solving the following logic problem. The gringo was shown two doors - one leading to a scaffold and the second one to freedom (both doors were the same) and only the door guards knew what was behind the doors. The sovereign let the gringo put one question to one guard. And because the sovereign was an honest man he warned that one guard is a Swindlecant. What logic question can save the gringo's life? You probably remember the answer from the very first problem on this page, don't you

There are a few types of questions:

  1. Indirect question: "Hey you, what would the other guard say, if I asked him where this door leads?" The answer is always negated.
  2. Tricky question: "Hey you, does an honestant stand at the door to freedom?" The answer will be YES, if I am asking an honestant who is standing at the door to freedom, or if I am asking a swindlecant standing again at the same door. So I can walk through the door. A similar deduction can be made for negative answer.
  3. Complicated question: "Hey you, what would you say, if I asked you ...?" An honestant is clear, but a swindlecant should lie. However, he is forced by the question to lie two times and thus speak the truth.
4. Our gringo was lucky and survived. On his way to the pub he met three aborigines. One made this statement: "We are all Swindlecants." The second one concluded: "Just one of us is an honest man." Who are they?

The first one must be a swindlecant (otherwise he would bring himself into a liar paradox), and so (knowing that the first one is lying) there must be at least one honestant among them. If the second one is lying, then (as the first one stated) the third one is an honestant, but that would make the second one speak the truth. So the second one is an honestant and C is a swindlecant.

5. In the pub the gringo met a funny guy who said: "If my wife is an Honestant, then I am Swindlecant." Who is this couple?  

It is important to explore the statement as a whole. In this logical conditional ("if-then" statement) p is a hypothesis (or antecedent) and q is a conclusion (or consequent).
It is obvious, that the husband is not a Swindlecant, because in that case one part of the statement (Q) " ... then I am Swindlecant." would have to be a lie, which is a conflict. And since A is an Honestant, the whole statement is true.
If his wife was an Honestant too, then the second part of statement (Q) " ... then I am Swindlecant." would have to be true, which is a conflict again. Therefore the man is an Honestant and his wife is a Swindlecant. Or is it a paradox? Think about it.


Trending News

Top News